Factors for Determining Quality Web Directories
Most people know about and consider PR as a factor for determining quality web directories. Although PR can be useful as a quick reference, it is far from the best or only consideration. Below you will find a list of other factors that should be taken into account when evaluating directories.
- Review the directory’s listing titles and descriptions. Titles and descriptions that contain only a list of keywords and do not form a complete sentence or clause are an immediate indication that the directory does not provide editorial review. Not only do these listings appear "spammy" and unorganized, but this also provides evidence that the directory’s listings are not reviewed for undesirable content.
- If the directory claims to be family-friendly, check to see if web sites listed contain nudity. There are arguments as to what exactly should be considered family-friendly. Many believe that web sites with swimwear or lingerie images should be acceptable while others feel otherwise, but it would be hard to argue that nudity should be acceptable for a family-friendly resource. Using the directory’s search function can be useful to find sites by undesired keywords.
- Check to ensure listings are properly categorized. Good co-citation is an important part of web directories. It is valuable to be listed alongside web sites that are related in content to yours. If a web directory does not properly categorize listings, the value of those listings is lessened.
- Check the directory’s backlinks. Quantity is good, but strong backlinks are better. Of course, a combination of both is usually ideal.
- The web directory’s Alexa rating can give a good indication of its traffic. Traffic is a very important factor that is often dismissed for quality web directories. Many web site owners and promoters think of directories only in terms of backlinks. While the strength of the directory and backlinks provided are certainly important, direct, targeted traffic is very valuable. Alexa data is far from perfect, but as traffic indicators go, it’s the best measurement we have. Alexa has a significant webmaster skew. However, since web directories are webmaster sites, this does not pose much of a problem for us in this case. Therefore, Alexa typically offers a good idea of the traffic-level for directories.
- Check search engine rankings for the web directory. An easy way to do this is to search for the main categories of the directory, such as Computer Web Directory, Shopping Web Directory, Entertainment Web Directory, Regional Web Directory, etc. Directories that rank well for searches relevant to their main categories are obviously considered favorably by the search engine, which is a very good indication of what the search engine considers to be quality.
This entry was posted on Friday, August 24th, 2007 at 5:03 pm and is filed under Tips for Directory Submitters, Tips for Directory Owners. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe
You can also check the Google cache date and run a search on Copyscape to see if they are using DMOZ descriptions.
Yes checking the directories rankings is a nice way to check the quality of a web directory.
For keywords like pets web directory, entertainment web directory, etc., my directory too ranks in the top 10…and I believe this determines our directory categories are good at every niche.
And regarding the traffic, I have to say that people should not completely depend on Alexa as it is not always true in showing rankings.
Nice, useful post. Worth considering above points before submitting.
Also, you can check PageStrength, Domain lookup (be careful, domain is not an expired domain), promotion, etc.
While all other points are on the dot, I would like to differ on point no. 5 –about Alexa and traffic.
Alexa ranking can be easily manipulated, and it does not corresponds with the traffic many directories receive.
I often think of asking the traffic stats of directories, but back out at the last moment because many won’t share.
Anyway, thanks for giving such tips. I specially like the first point.
There have been a couple comments about Alexa. As mentioned in the post, Alexa is certainly not perfect, but it seems to give a good indication of traffic, especially as values get lower. As far as I know, it’s the best option we have available for judging traffic.
Yep, have to agree with you. There is no alternative as yet. Rob has been using G Analytics, and I see a huge difference between awastats and G/A traffic stats. G/A is showing me 1/3rd the total uniques of awastats, but organic traffic is showing a huge jump –from 4% on awastats to 44% on G/A. Don’t know which one to take.
That brings something into my head —
I would like this opportunity to suggest for you to build a site/software that would show stats Alexa-like, but won’t be manipulative.
I believe you can really do it.
Regards
Another useful post, Chris. Hopefully, people will read this and stop using PR as the final judgment.
Read your post, indeed good tips. I wrote “How much to pay for a featured listing? in my blog. Hopefully, I added something else this post did not cover.